| TRANSFORMING EFFICIENCY
March 2008
In
this environmentally conscious era, if there were a way to cut
energy losses by an amount equivalent to 1% of all electricity
consumed, surely the network operating companies (NOCs) and large
users of electricity would be rushing to adopt it? Astonishingly,
in Europe and the USA the opportunity to achieve this significant
saving is largely being ignored, says Stuart Harvey of Silverteam.
Transformers
are key components in every electrical distribution network. They’re
used in multiple locations throughout the NOC’s systems,
and large energy users such as factories and hospitals frequently
have one or more power transformers of their own, usually forming
part of an on-site substation.
Given the
ever-present and growing need for energy efficiency, the good
news is that transformers are relatively efficient. In fact, with
typical modern power transformers efficiencies in excess of 97%
are routinely achieved, which on the face of it sounds perfectly
satisfactory.
Looked at
in another way, however, this figure means that up to 3% of all
electrical power generated is wasted in transformer losses. Clearly
these losses are far from negligible, and anything that can be
done to reduce them has the potential to deliver huge savings,
not just in monetary terms, but also in terms of reduced environmental
impact.
And there
is a perfectly good way of cutting these losses – the use
of transformers with amorphous cores.
Conventional
transformers have cores assembled from stacks of laminations that
are made from silicon steel with an almost uniform crystalline
structure. In transformers with amorphous cores, a ribbon of steel
is wound, usually into a rectangular toroid shape, to form the
core. Although the material used for the core is still a form
of silicon steel, it is produced in such a way that it has no
regular crystalline structure – hence the name amorphous,
which means without structure.
The big benefit
is that amorphous steel has lower hysteresis losses. Put in simple
terms, this means that less energy is wasted in magnetising and
demagnetising it during each cycle of the supply current. In addition,
the construction of amorphous cores means that they have higher
electrical resistance than conventional cores, so losses due to
unwanted eddy currents in the core are also reduced.
These effects,
known collectively as iron losses, are most significant in transformers
that are lightly loaded, so just how important are they in practice?
To answer this question, it’s important to realise that
transformers rarely operate at full load. In fact, because they
have to be sized to handle the maximum anticipated load, most
spend many hours a day very lightly loaded.
For example,
a transformer supplying a factory may be, say, 70% loaded during
working hours, and only 10% loaded during the evenings and at
weekends. This variation in loading is usually expressed as a
load factor that, in effect, represents the percentage of the
transformer’s overall capacity to supply energy that is
used over a given period – often a year.
On this basis,
studies have shown that transformers used to supply factories
typically have load factors around 40%, while those used to supply
offices, hospitals and similar premises often have load factors
as low as 20%.
With this
in mind, let’s look at some loss data for a 500kVA transformer
supplying an industrial installation with a load factor of 40%.
With a conventional transformer of modern design, the no-load
losses were 665W, while the on-load losses were 4,400W. At 40%
load factor, this equates to total losses of 11,992 kWh per year.
With an amorphous core transformer, the corresponding figures
are 220W, 3,500W and annual losses of just 6,883 kWh.
This is a
massive reduction of 5,159 kWh which, at £0.08 per unit,
corresponds to a cash saving in excess of £400. Over the
typical 30-year life of the transformer, the saving is an impressive
£12,000 at today’s prices. Even more impressive is
the associated reduction in CO2 emissions, which equates to almost
3 tonnes per year.
Finally, it’s
worth noting that these calculations are based on an industrial
installation with a 40% load factor. In commercial and residential
applications where the load factor is invariably lower, even greater
savings will be achieved.
If power transformers
with amorphous cores have so much to offer, the big question has
to be why are they not more widely used? Before answering this
question, it’s important to put it in a global context.
The demand for amorphous core transformers is, in fact, increasing
rapidly in many countries, including Japan, China and India. The
big exceptions are Europe and the USA.
In these relatively
conservative markets, the usual objection is that amorphous core
transformers are more expensive than their conventional counterparts.
There is some truth in this but, in recent years; the silicon
steel used in ordinary transformers has increased in price much
more rapidly than the amorphous materials, so the price differential
between the two types of transformer is now small.
Recent calculations
have, in fact, shown that the payback period for the extra investment
in an amorphous core transformer is usually in the region of three
to five years. If, as seems likely, energy prices increase, this
period will become even shorter.
Regrettably
the problem still remains of contracts being placed on the lowest
initial price, often with scant regard to lifetime costs. Growing
environmental concern is, however, starting to force a change
in this attitude, which hopefully means that the benefits of amorphous
core transformers will, in future, be more carefully taken into
account when contracts are placed.
Other objections
raised in connection with amorphous core transformers are that
they are physically larger than conventional types, and that they
generate more noise. Once again there is an element of truth behind
these assertions but, with the latest amorphous materials, these
differences are becoming smaller and, in particular, the noise
issue is almost completely solved.
In a world
where global warming is already starting to have severe consequences,
no one can afford to be complacent about energy losses –
least of all organisations that generate, distribute and use large
amounts of electrical energy.
For these
organisations, amorphous core transformers open a cost-effective
route to achieving savings which may be seem small in percentage
terms, but which, in terms of kWh of energy and tonnes of CO2
saved per year are truly enormous. Put simply, now’s the
time to switch to amorphous – our planet needs and deserves
no less.
|